Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.825
Filtrar
1.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 35(1): 79-93, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661861

RESUMO

Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) services is a Medicaid benefit for children that addresses their health problems before they become advanced, debilitating, and expensive. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of pediatric beneficiaries (newborn to younger than 21 years) enrolled in a Medicaid managed care organization to examine the factors associated with EPSDT screening services completion. We obtained 2018 administrative claims data for beneficiaries continuously enrolled for a minimum of 90 days (n=156,108). Completion of EPSDT screening services among our Medicaid managed care beneficiaries was low. Those having more emergency department visits and hospitalizations, having family medicine practitioners as primary care physicians, belonging to the racial/ethnic group Asian/Pacific Islander/Hawaiian/Alaskan Native/Native American, and 18 to younger than 21 years age group were less likely than others to complete EPSDT services. Our results provide information on segments of pediatric beneficiaries that can be targeted to increase EPSDT screening services completion.


Assuntos
Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Medicaid , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Lactente , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/organização & administração , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Recém-Nascido , Adulto Jovem , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 35(1): 209-224, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661867

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to measure the association of dental provider density and receipt of dental care among Medicaid-enrolled adults. METHODS: We used four years of Indiana Medicaid claims and enrollment data (2015 to 2018) and the Area Health Resources File to examine the relationship between any dental visit (ADV) or any preventive dental visit (PDV) and three county-level measures of dental provider density (the total number of Medicaid-participating dentists, a binary indicator of a federally qualified health center (FQHC) with a Medicaid-participating dentist, and the overall county dentist-to-population ratio). RESULTS: The likelihood of ADV or PDV increased with greater density of Medicaid-participating dentists as well as dentists accepting Medicaid working at an FQHC within the county. The overall dentist-to-population ratio was not associated with dental care use among the adult Medicaid population. CONCLUSION: Dentist participation in Medicaid program may be a modifiable barrier to Medicaid-enrolled adults' receipt of dental care.


Assuntos
Assistência Odontológica , Odontólogos , Medicaid , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Feminino , Masculino , Assistência Odontológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Odontólogos/estatística & dados numéricos , Indiana , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente
4.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 46(4): 181-187, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551912

RESUMO

Adults and children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are predominantly African American, with pain-related health disparities. We examined opioid prescription fill patterns in adults and children with SCD and compared factors associated with fills in North Carolina Medicaid enrollees. Our retrospective cohort study included 955 enrollees diagnosed with SCD having at least one opioid fill. Associations were measured between two cohorts (12 and 24 mo of continuous enrollment) for the following characteristics: sex, age, enrollee residence, hydroxyurea adherence, comanagement, enrollment in Community Care North Carolina, prescription for short versus short and long-acting opioids, and emergency department reliance. The majority of individuals did not have an opioid claim over a 12 or 24-month period. Claims increased at ages 10 to 17, peaking at ages 18 to 30. The increased number of claims was associated with the following factors: increasing age, male, short versus long-acting opioids, and Medicaid enrollment for 24 versus 12 months. Community Care North Carolina enrollees in the 12-month cohort had higher opioid days of supply per month; the inverse was true of the 24-month cohort.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Anemia Falciforme , Medicaid , Humanos , Anemia Falciforme/tratamento farmacológico , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Criança , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem , Pré-Escolar , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/etiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 47(2): 96-103, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38335049

RESUMO

We examined self-reported inability to access to needed medical care and reasons for not accessing medical care among US-representative adult Medicaid enrollees, disaggregated across 10 Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander ethnic groups. Chinese (-4.54 percentage points [PP], P < .001), Other Asian (-4.42 PP, P < .001), and Native Hawaiian (-4.36 PP, P < .001) enrollees were significantly less likely to report being unable to access needed medical care compared with non-Hispanic White enrollees. The most common reason reported was that a health plan would not approve, cover, or pay for care. Mitigating inequities may require different interventions specific to certain ethnic groups.


Assuntos
Nativo Asiático-Americano do Havaí e das Ilhas do Pacífico , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Medicaid , Adulto , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Nativo Asiático-Americano do Havaí e das Ilhas do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
JAMA ; 331(8): 687-695, 2024 02 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411645

RESUMO

Importance: The extent to which changes in health sector finances impact economic outcomes among health care workers, especially lower-income workers, is not well known. Objective: To assess the association between state adoption of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion-which led to substantial improvements in health care organization finances-and health care workers' annual incomes and benefits, and whether these associations varied across low- and high-wage occupations. Design, Setting, and Participants: Difference-in-differences analysis to assess differential changes in health care workers' economic outcomes before and after Medicaid expansion among workers in 30 states that expanded Medicaid relative to workers in 16 states that did not, by examining US individuals aged 18 through 65 years employed in the health care industry surveyed in the 2010-2019 American Community Surveys. Exposure: Time-varying state-level adoption of Medicaid expansion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was annual earned income; secondary outcomes included receipt of employer-sponsored health insurance, Medicaid, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. Results: The sample included 1 322 263 health care workers from 2010-2019. Health care workers in expansion states were similar to those in nonexpansion states in age, sex, and educational attainment, but those in expansion states were less likely to identify as non-Hispanic Black. Medicaid expansion was associated with a 2.16% increase in annual incomes (95% CI, 0.66%-3.65%; P = .005). This effect was driven by significant increases in annual incomes among the top 2 highest-earning quintiles (ß coefficient, 2.91%-3.72%), which includes registered nurses, physicians, and executives. Health care workers in lower-earning quintiles did not experience any significant changes. Medicaid expansion was associated with a 3.15 percentage point increase in the likelihood that a health care worker received Medicaid benefits (95% CI, 2.46 to 3.84; P < .001), with the largest increases among the 2 lowest-earning quintiles, which includes health aides, orderlies, and sanitation workers. There were significant decreases in employer-sponsored health insurance and increases in SNAP following Medicaid expansion. Conclusion and Relevance: Medicaid expansion was associated with increases in compensation for health care workers, but only among the highest earners. These findings suggest that improvements in health care sector finances may increase economic inequality among health care workers, with implications for worker health and well-being.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Renda , Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Humanos , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/economia , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/economia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/economia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Status Econômico/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Econômicos
7.
Natl Health Stat Report ; (197): 1-15, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252463

RESUMO

Purpose-This report describes trends in emergency department visits among people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2021, by health insurance status and selected demographic and hospital characteristics. Methods-Estimates in this report are based on data collected in the 2010-2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Data were weighted to produce annual national estimates. Patient and hospital characteristics are presented by primary expected source of payment. Results-Private insurance and Medicaid were the most common primary expected sources of payment at emergency department visits by people younger than age 65 from 2010 through 2013. Medicaid was the most common primary expected source of payment from 2014 through 2021. Among children younger than age 18 years, the most common primary expected source of payment was Medicaid across the entire period. The percentage of visits by children with no insurance decreased from 7.4% in 2010 to 3.0% in 2021. Among adults, the percentage of visits with Medicaid increased from 25.5% in 2010 to 38.9% in 2021, and the percentage of visits by those with no insurance decreased from 24.6% to 11.1% during this period. Among Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic people, Medicaid was the most frequent primary expected source of payment during the entire period. Among White non-Hispanic people, private insurance was the most frequent primary expected source of payment through 2015, while private insurance and Medicaid were the most frequent primary expected sources of payment from 2016 through 2021.


Assuntos
60530 , Cobertura do Seguro , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , 60530/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
JAMA ; 331(2): 124-131, 2024 01 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193961

RESUMO

Importance: The End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model randomly selected 30% of US dialysis facilities to receive financial incentives based on their use of home dialysis, kidney transplant waitlisting, or transplant receipt. Facilities that disproportionately serve populations with high social risk have a lower use of home dialysis and kidney transplant raising concerns that these sites may fare poorly in the payment model. Objective: To examine first-year ETC model performance scores and financial penalties across dialysis facilities, stratified by their incident patients' social risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study of 2191 US dialysis facilities that participated in the ETC model from January 1 through December 31, 2021. Exposure: Composition of incident patient population, characterized by the proportion of patients who were non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, living in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood, uninsured, or covered by Medicaid at dialysis initiation. A facility-level composite social risk score assessed whether each facility was in the highest quintile of having 0, 1, or at least 2 of these characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of home dialysis, waitlisting, or transplant; model performance score; and financial penalization. Results: Using data from 125 984 incident patients (median age, 65 years [IQR, 54-74]; 41.8% female; 28.6% Black; 11.7% Hispanic), 1071 dialysis facilities (48.9%) had no social risk features, and 491 (22.4%) had 2 or more. In the first year of the ETC model, compared with those with no social risk features, dialysis facilities with 2 or more had lower mean performance scores (3.4 vs 3.6, P = .002) and lower use of home dialysis (14.1% vs 16.0%, P < .001). These facilities had higher receipt of financial penalties (18.5% vs 11.5%, P < .001), more frequently had the highest payment cut of 5% (2.4% vs 0.7%; P = .003), and were less likely to achieve the highest bonus of 4% (0% vs 2.7%; P < .001). Compared with all other facilities, those in the highest quintile of treating uninsured patients or those covered by Medicaid experienced more financial penalties (17.4% vs 12.9%, P = .01) as did those in the highest quintile in the proportion of patients who were Black (18.5% vs 12.6%, P = .001). Conclusions: In the first year of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' ETC model, dialysis facilities serving higher proportions of patients with social risk features had lower performance scores and experienced markedly higher receipt of financial penalties.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica , Reembolso de Incentivo , Diálise Renal , Autocuidado , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/etnologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Econômicos , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/métodos , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/economia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Listas de Espera , Autocuidado/economia , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
JAMA ; 330(3): 238-246, 2023 07 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462705

RESUMO

Importance: Professional medical organizations recommend that adults receive routine postpartum care. Yet, some states restrict public insurance coverage for undocumented immigrants and recently documented immigrants (those who received legal documentation status within the past 5 years). Objective: To examine the association between public insurance coverage and postpartum care among low-income immigrants and the difference in receipt of postpartum care among immigrants relative to nonimmigrants. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pooled, cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for 19 states and New York City including low-income adults with a live birth between 2012 and 2019. Exposure: Giving birth in a state that offered public insurance coverage for postpartum care to recently documented or undocumented immigrants. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported receipt of postpartum care by the category of coverage offered (full coverage: states that offered publicly funded postpartum care regardless of immigration status; moderate coverage: states that offered publicly funded postpartum care to lawfully residing immigrants without a 5-year waiting period, but did not offer postpartum care to undocumented immigrants; no coverage: states that did not offer publicly funded postpartum care to lawfully present immigrants before 5 years of legal residence or to undocumented immigrants). Results: The study included 72 981 low-income adults (20 971 immigrants [29%] and 52 010 nonimmigrants [71%]). Of the 19 included states and New York City, 6 offered full coverage, 9 offered moderate coverage, and 4 offered no coverage; 1 state (Oregon) switched from offering moderate coverage to offering full coverage. Compared with the states that offered full coverage, receipt of postpartum care among immigrants was 7.0-percentage-points lower (95% CI, -10.6 to -3.4 percentage points) in the states that offered moderate coverage and 11.3-percentage-points lower (95% CI, -13.9 to -8.8 percentage points) in the states that offered no coverage. The differences in the receipt of postpartum care among immigrants relative to nonimmigrants were also associated with the coverage categories. Compared with the states that offered full coverage, there was a 3.3-percentage-point larger difference (95% CI, -5.3 to -1.4 percentage points) in the states that offered moderate coverage and a 7.7-percentage-point larger difference (95% CI, -10.3 to -5.0 percentage points) in the states that offered no coverage. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with states without insurance restrictions, immigrants living in states with public insurance restrictions were less likely to receive postpartum care. Restricting public insurance coverage may be an important policy-driven barrier to receipt of recommended pregnancy care and improved maternal health among immigrants.


Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Política de Saúde , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Cobertura do Seguro , Medicaid , Cuidado Pós-Natal , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Transversais , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/legislação & jurisprudência , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pós-Natal/legislação & jurisprudência , Cuidado Pós-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Imigrantes Indocumentados/legislação & jurisprudência , Imigrantes Indocumentados/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 45(6): e662-e670, 2023 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278568

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Understanding the role of health insurance in cancer survival in a diverse population of pediatric radiation oncology patients could help to identify patients at risk of adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from cancer patients evaluated for radiation therapy, age < 19, diagnosed from January 1990 to August 2019. Predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by univariable and multivariable Cox regression. Variables included health insurance, diagnosis type, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status deprivation index. RESULTS: The study included 459 patients with a median diagnosis age of 9 years. Demographic breakdown was 49.5% Hispanic, 27.2% non-Hispanic White, and 20.7% non-Hispanic Black. There were 203 recurrences and 86 deaths observed over a median follow-up of 2.4 years. Five-year RFS was 59.8% (95% CI, 51.6, 67.0) versus 36.5% (95% CI, 26.6, 46.6), and 5-year OS was 87.5% (95% CI, 80.9, 91.9) versus 71.0% (95% CI, 60.3, 79.3) in private pay insurance versus Medicaid/Medicare, respectively. Multivariable showed Medicaid/Medicare patients experienced a 54% higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.54, 95% CI, 1.08, 2.20) and 79% higher risk of death (hazard ratio: 1.79, 95% CI, 1.02, 3.14) than privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Significant disadvantages in RFS and OS were identified in radiation oncology patients with Medicaid/Medicare insurance, even after adjusting for clinical and demographic variables.


Assuntos
Medicaid , Medicare , Neoplasias , Criança , Humanos , Etnicidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Brancos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37372761

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There is mounting evidence that neighborhoods contribute to perinatal health inequity. We aimed (1) to determine whether neighborhood deprivation (a composite marker of area-level poverty, education, and housing) is associated with early pregnancy impaired glucose intolerance (IGT) and pre-pregnancy obesity and (2) to quantify the extent to which neighborhood deprivation may explain racial disparities in IGT and obesity. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of non-diabetic patients with singleton births ≥ 20 weeks' gestation from 1 January 2017-31 December 2019 in two Philadelphia hospitals. The primary outcome was IGT (HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) at <20 weeks' gestation. Addresses were geocoded and census tract neighborhood deprivation index (range 0-1, higher indicating more deprivation) was calculated. Mixed-effects logistic regression and causal mediation models adjusted for covariates were used. RESULTS: Of the 10,642 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 49% self-identified as Black, 49% were Medicaid insured, 32% were obese, and 11% had IGT. There were large racial disparities in IGT (16% vs. 3%) and obesity (45% vs. 16%) among Black vs. White patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). Mean (SD) neighborhood deprivation was higher among Black (0.55 (0.10)) compared with White patients (0.36 (0.11)) (p < 0.0001). Neighborhood deprivation was associated with IGT and obesity in models adjusted for age, insurance, parity, and race (aOR 1.15, 95%CI: 1.07, 1.24 and aOR 1.39, 95%CI: 1.28, 1.52, respectively). Mediation analysis revealed that 6.7% (95%CI: 1.6%, 11.7%) of the Black-White disparity in IGT might be explained by neighborhood deprivation and 13.3% (95%CI: 10.7%, 16.7%) by obesity. Mediation analysis also suggested that 17.4% (95%CI: 12.0%, 22.4%) of the Black-White disparity in obesity may be explained by neighborhood deprivation. CONCLUSION: Neighborhood deprivation may contribute to early pregnancy IGT and obesity-surrogate markers of periconceptional metabolic health in which there are large racial disparities. Investing in neighborhoods where Black patients live may improve perinatal health equity.


Assuntos
Intolerância à Glucose , Iniquidades em Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Obesidade , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Intolerância à Glucose/epidemiologia , Intolerância à Glucose/etnologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/etnologia , Características de Residência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Características da Vizinhança , Privação Social , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Philadelphia/epidemiologia , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Equidade em Saúde
14.
Gynecol Oncol ; 174: 1-10, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37141816

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery and to estimate its effect on overall survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was surveyed for patients with uterine, cervical or ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer treated between 2004 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess associations between clinico-demographic variables and refusal of surgery. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Trends in refusal over time were evaluated using joinpoint regression. RESULTS: Of 788,164 women included in our analysis, 5875 (0.75%) patients refused surgery recommended by their treating oncologist. Patients who refused surgery were older at diagnosis (72.4 vs 60.3 years, p < 0.001) and more likely Black (OR 1.77 95% CI 1.62-1.92). Refusal of surgery was associated with uninsured status (OR 2.94 95% CI 2.49-3.46), Medicaid coverage (OR 2.79 95% CI 2.46-3.18), low regional high school graduation (OR 1.18 95% CI 1.05-1.33) and treatment at a community hospital (OR 1.59 95% CI 1.42-1.78). Patients who refused surgery had lower median overall survival (1.0 vs 14.0 years, p < 0.01) and this difference persisted across disease sites. Between 2008 and 2017, there was a significant increase in refusal of surgery annually (annual percent change +1.41%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple social determinants of health are independently associated with refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer. Given that patients who refuse surgery are more likely from vulnerable, underserved populations and have inferior survival, refusal of surgery should be considered a surgical healthcare disparity and tackled as such.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
JAMA ; 329(10): 819-826, 2023 03 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36917051

RESUMO

Importance: Gender-affirming surgery is often beneficial for gender-diverse or -dysphoric patients. Access to gender-affirming surgery is often limited through restrictive legislation and insurance policies. Objective: To investigate the association between California's 2013 implementation of the Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act, which prohibits insurers and health plans from limiting benefits based on a patient's sex, gender, gender identity, or gender expression, and utilization of gender-affirming surgery among California residents. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population epidemiology study of transgender and gender-diverse patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery (facial, chest, and genital surgery) between 2005 and 2019. Utilization of gender-affirming surgery in California before and after implementation of the Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act in July 2013 was compared with utilization in Washington and Arizona, control states chosen because of geographic similarity and because they expanded Medicaid on the same date as California-January 1, 2014. The date of last follow-up was December 31, 2019. Exposures: California's Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act, implemented on July 9, 2013. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of gender-affirming surgery, defined as undergoing at least 1 facial, chest, or genital procedure. Results: A total of 25 252 patients (California: n = 17 934 [71%]; control: n = 7328 [29%]) had a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. Median ages were 34.0 years in California (with or without gender-affirming surgery), 39 years (IQR, 28-49 years) among those undergoing gender-affirming surgery in control states, and 36 years (IQR, 22-56 years) among those not undergoing gender-affirming surgery in control states. Patients underwent at least 1 gender-affirming surgery within the study period in 2918 (11.6%) admissions-2715 (15.1%) in California vs 203 (2.8%) in control states. There was a statistically significant increase in gender-affirming surgery in the third quarter of July 2013 in California vs control states, coinciding with the timing of the Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act (P < .001). Implementation of the policy was associated with an absolute 12.1% (95% CI, 10.3%-13.9%; P < .001) increase in the probability of undergoing gender-affirming surgery in California vs control states observed in the subset of insured patients (13.4% [95% CI, 11.5%-15.4%]; P < .001) but not self-pay patients (-22.6% [95% CI, -32.8% to -12.5%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Implementation in California of its Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act was associated with a significant increase in utilization of gender-affirming surgery in California compared with the control states Washington and Arizona. These data might inform state legislative efforts to craft policies preventing discrimination in health coverage for state residents, including transgender and gender-diverse patients.


Assuntos
Identidade de Gênero , Seguro Saúde , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , California/epidemiologia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual/economia , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual/legislação & jurisprudência , Cirurgia de Readequação Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Washington/epidemiologia , Arizona/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/legislação & jurisprudência , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
JAMA ; 329(12): 1000-1011, 2023 03 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36976279

RESUMO

Importance: Approximately 1 in 6 youth in the US have a mental health condition, and suicide is a leading cause of death among this population. Recent national statistics describing acute care hospitalizations for mental health conditions are lacking. Objectives: To describe national trends in pediatric mental health hospitalizations between 2009 and 2019, to compare utilization among mental health and non-mental health hospitalizations, and to characterize variation in utilization across hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective analysis of the 2009, 2012, 2016, and 2019 Kids' Inpatient Database, a nationally representative database of US acute care hospital discharges. Analysis included 4 767 840 weighted hospitalizations among children 3 to 17 years of age. Exposures: Hospitalizations with primary mental health diagnoses were identified using the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Disorders Classification System, which classified mental health diagnoses into 30 mutually exclusive disorder types. Main Outcomes and Measures: Measures included number and proportion of hospitalizations with a primary mental health diagnosis and with attempted suicide, suicidal ideation, or self-injury; number and proportion of hospital days and interfacility transfers attributable to mental health hospitalizations; mean lengths of stay (days) and transfer rates among mental health and non-mental health hospitalizations; and variation in these measures across hospitals. Results: Of 201 932 pediatric mental health hospitalizations in 2019, 123 342 (61.1% [95% CI, 60.3%-61.9%]) were in females, 100 038 (49.5% [95% CI, 48.3%-50.7%]) were in adolescents aged 15 to 17 years, and 103 456 (51.3% [95% CI, 48.6%-53.9%]) were covered by Medicaid. Between 2009 and 2019, the number of pediatric mental health hospitalizations increased by 25.8%, and these hospitalizations accounted for a significantly higher proportion of pediatric hospitalizations (11.5% [95% CI, 10.2%-12.8%] vs 19.8% [95% CI, 17.7%-21.9%]), hospital days (22.2% [95% CI, 19.1%-25.3%] vs 28.7% [95% CI, 24.4%-33.0%]), and interfacility transfers (36.9% [95% CI, 33.2%-40.5%] vs 49.3% [95% CI, 45.9%-52.7%]). The percentage of mental health hospitalizations with attempted suicide, suicidal ideation, or self-injury diagnoses increased significantly from 30.7% (95% CI, 28.6%-32.8%) in 2009 to 64.2% (95% CI, 62.3%-66.2%) in 2019. Length of stay and interfacility transfer rates varied significantly across hospitals. Across all years, mental health hospitalizations had significantly longer mean lengths of stay and higher transfer rates compared with non-mental health hospitalizations. Conclusions and Relevance: Between 2009 and 2019, the number and proportion of pediatric acute care hospitalizations due to mental health diagnoses increased significantly. The majority of mental health hospitalizations in 2019 included a diagnosis of attempted suicide, suicidal ideation, or self-injury, underscoring the increasing importance of this concern.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Hospitais , Transtornos Mentais , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/tendências , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/tendências , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/tendências , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Mental/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Suicídio/tendências , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/tendências
18.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 71(4): 1259-1266, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585893

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary care is essential for persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Prior research suggests that the propensity to provide high-quality, continuous primary care varies by provider setting, but the settings used by Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligibles with ADRD have not been described at the population level. METHODS: Using 2012-2018 Medicare data, we identified dual-eligibles with ADRD. For each person-year, we identified primary care visits occurring in six settings. We calculated descriptive statistics for beneficiaries with a majority of visits in each setting, and conducted a k-means cluster analysis to determine utilization patterns, using the standardized count of primary care visits in each setting. RESULTS: Each year from 2012 to 2018, at least 45.6% of dual-eligibles with ADRD received a majority of their primary care in nursing facilities, while at least 25.2% did so in physician offices. Over time, the share relying on nursing facilities for primary care decreased by 5.2 percentage points, offset by growth in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and miscellaneous settings (2.3 percentage points each). Dual-eligibles relying on nursing facilities had more annual primary care visits (16.1) than those relying on other settings (range: 6.8-10.7 visits). Interpersonal care continuity was also higher in nursing facilities (97.0%) and physician offices (87.9%) than in FQHCs (54.2%), rural health clinics (RHCs, 46.6%), or hospital-based clinics (56.8%). Among dual-eligibles without care continuity, 82.7% were assigned to a cluster with few primary care visits. CONCLUSIONS: A trend toward care in different settings likely reflects improved access to patient-centered primary care. Low rates of interpersonal care continuity in FQHCs, RHCs, and physician offices may warrant concern, unless providers in these settings function as a care team. Nonetheless, every healthcare system encounter presents an opportunity to designate a primary care provider for dual-eligibles with ADRD who use little or no primary care.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Medicaid , Medicare , Enfermagem de Atenção Primária , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doença de Alzheimer/epidemiologia , Doença de Alzheimer/enfermagem , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Visita a Consultório Médico/tendências , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Enfermagem de Atenção Primária/métodos , Enfermagem de Atenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfermagem de Atenção Primária/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Instalações de Saúde
19.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 34(4): 1290-1304, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661756

RESUMO

Understanding the extent to which demographic and socioeconomic factors play a role in the disparities associated with duration between testing positive for COVID-19 and hospital admission will help in achieving equitable health outcomes. This project linked the statewide COVID-19 registry to administrative datasets to examine the variation in times between testing positive for COVID-19 and hospital admission by race/ethnicity and insurance. In 2020, there were 11,314 patients admitted for COVID-19 in Arkansas. Approximately 42.2% tested positive for COVID-19 on the same day as hospital admission. Black patients had 38% higher odds of hospitalization on the day of testing compared with White patients (p<.001). Medicaid and uninsured patients had 51% and 50% higher odds of admission on the day of testing compared with privately insured patients (both p<.001), respectively. This study highlights the implications of reduced access to testing with respect to equitable health outcomes.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Etnicidade , Hospitalização , Cobertura do Seguro , Humanos , COVID-19/etnologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Arkansas , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Idoso , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente
20.
JAMA ; 328(24): 2422-2430, 2022 12 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36573975

RESUMO

Importance: Family income is known to be associated with children's health; the association may be particularly pronounced among lower-income children in the US, who tend to have more limited access to health resources than their higher-income peers. Objective: To investigate the association of family income with claims-based measures of morbidity and mortality among children and adolescents in lower-income families in the US enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis included 795 000 participants aged 5 to 17 years enrolled in Medicaid (Medicaid Analytic eXtract claims, 2011-2012) living in families with income below 200% of the federal poverty threshold (American Community Survey, 2008-2013). Follow-up ended in December 2021. Exposures: Family income relative to the federal poverty threshold. Main Outcomes and Measures: Record of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes for an infection, mental health disorder, injury, asthma, anemia, or substance use disorder and death record within 10 years of observation (Social Security Administration death records through 2021). Results: Among 795 000 individuals in the sample (all statistics weighted: mean [SD] income-to-poverty ratio, 90% [53%]; mean [SD] age, 10.6 [3.9] years; 56% aged 10 to 17 years), 33% had a diagnosed infection, 13% had a mental health disorder, 6% had an injury, 5% had asthma, 2% had anemia, 1% had a substance use disorder, and 0.6% died between 2011 and 2021, with the mean (SD) age at death of 19.8 (4.2) years. For those aged 5 to 9 years, higher family income was associated with lower adjusted prevalence of all outcomes, except mortality: children in families with an additional 100% income relative to the federal poverty threshold had 2.3 (95% CI, 1.8-2.9) percentage points fewer infections, 1.9 (95% CI, 1.5-2.2) percentage points fewer mental health diagnoses, 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5-0.8) percentage points fewer injuries, 0.3 (95% CI, 0.09-0.5) percentage points less asthma, 0.2 (95% CI, 0.08-0.3) percentage points less anemia, and 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.09) percentage points fewer substance use disorder diagnoses. Except for injury and anemia, the associations were more pronounced among those aged 10 to 17 years than those 5 to 9 years (P for interaction <.05). For those aged 10 to 17 years, an additional 100% income relative to the federal poverty threshold was associated with a lower 10-year mortality rate by 0.18 (95% CI, 0.12-0.25) percentage points. Conclusions and Relevance: Among children and adolescents in the US aged 5 to 17 years with family income under 200% of the federal poverty threshold who accessed health care through Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program, higher family income was significantly associated with a lower prevalence of diagnosed infections, mental health disorders, injury, asthma, anemia, and substance use disorders and lower 10-year mortality. Further research is needed to understand whether these associations are causal.


Assuntos
Saúde do Adolescente , Saúde da Criança , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Renda , Pobreza , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Asma/economia , Asma/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Morbidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Família , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde da Criança/economia , Saúde da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Escolar , Prevalência , Saúde do Adolescente/economia , Saúde do Adolescente/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...